
How Green a Cyclist are You?
Take the test
here.
Bicycle Act:
"Whereas a national transportation system
conducive to bicycling produces enriched health, reduced
traffic congestion and air pollution, economic vitality, and
an overall improved quality of living is valuable for the
Nation...
Whereas by dramatically increasing levels
of bicycling in United States cities tangible and intangible
benefits to the quality of life for cities and towns across
the country will be realized...
Whereas bicycle commuters annually save on
average $1,825 in auto-related costs, reduce their carbon
emissions by 128 pounds, conserve 145 gallons of gasoline,
and avoid 50 hours of gridlock traffic...
Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the
House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the
Congress-- (1) recognizes that increased and safe bicycle
use for transportation and recreation is in the national
interest... "
Sound like a dream? Read more
here.
The Complete Streets Movement:
Communities around the nation are rethinking
the Streets=Automobile Arteries paradigm that has dominated much
of American post WWII planning. Efforts to make streets
more congenial to *all* forms of transportation. Also known as
"The Complete Streets" movement is explored
here.
Bicycling and Moral Priorities:
"Is the
choice to bicycle a moral choice, or merely
a personal preference? Is it a personal
preference justified — retrospectively and righteously — as
a moral matter? If I do believe cycling has moral
significance, is it still better to show people why they
might prefer cycling, rather than insisting upon its moral
credentials?"
Elise Springer discusses the bicycle and
its relationship to morality
here (Click on the Bicycle and Moral Priorities
on the right-hand side).
Students Given Free Bikes to Pledge No Cars:
What a great idea. Have freshmen pledge
to not bring a car to campus and reward them with a free bike.
Read more
here.
Could Wesleyan try this? What about with
Faculty and Staff? What about Middlesex Hospital or other
large employers in town?
The Environmental Cost of Suburbanization and the McMansion
Phenomena:
The New York Times had an interesting piece on
the environmental cost of suburban living.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/fashion/10suburbs.html
Together with an article in this month's Atlantic on the
projected 'slummification' of all those McMansions built in the
1980s and 1990s (and still today), the future of the suburbs
looks pretty bleak. And the future of towns like Middletown
looks pretty good. (Russell Library gets the Atlantic, as does
the excellent library at Middlesex Community College -- where
you can sit in a room with a tremendous view of Middletown.)
But a pressing question for Middletown given these stories,
particularly in light of tonight's Parking Study Group meeting,
is: How to undo the 'suburbification' of so many of Middletown's
neighborhoods, where residents are entirely dependent on their
automobiles despite living within a mile or two (or three) of
downtown? Certainly a bike path will be a major step in the
right direction, but perhaps we also need more sidewalks, more
-- and more frequent -- bus routes (with smaller, greener
buses), and more and better crosswalks (and pedestrian-friendly
crosswalk laws) across
major traffic arteries.
Vijay Pinch
Portland Oregon, Creating a 2-Wheeled Culture:
John Elmore found this
article on Portland and how a focus on cycling
infrastructure has really helped create a two-wheeled commuting
and neighborhood shopping culture. Just the thing that
Middletown could benefit from.
The Benefits of Biking:
Allison Burson sent us
this
article looking at the benefits of cycling.
How Does Wesleyan Compare?
The 2008 College Sustainability Report gives
some interesting information on how Wesleyan is doing.
Note the part on Transportation:
Transportation C (grade):
The university
has purchased two electric cars and has ordered two electric
DYMAC trucks for use as waste management vehicles on campus.
The public safety department is considering the use of a
hybrid vehicle for patrols on campus. A student group has
designed and expects to implement a bicycle repair program
to distribute abandoned bikes to students, faculty, and
staff.
Read the full PDF
here.
Bicycle Tracks:
Anne Lusk of Harvard's School of Public Health has a
startling - many would say quixotic - ambition for America's
cities. She'd like to equip them all with cycle tracks. Read the
article
here.
Sharing/Borrowing Someone's Bicycle:
An experimental project in New York addresses private
property and communal access to bicycles. Read the article
here.
Smart Growth - by Vijay Pinch:
The Hartford Courant has had couple of articles on smart
growth.
The first, by Tom Condon, examines the appropriation of the term "smart
growth" by developers, comparing it to the way the term "natural" was
leveraged by mega-corporations in the 1970s to market junk. Eventually
the meaninglessness of the term "natural" prompted foodies to turn to
"organic" and the creation of real standards for certification. Condon
implies that we need a similar semantic and regulatory shift in approach
to "smart growth." A major problem he points to is the tendency to
create housing developments, particularly "active adult communities", in
areas that are not connected to public transportation.
The other piece, by James Repass of the National Corridors Initiative,
describes the success of the Boston to Portland Amtrak line (the
DownEaster) in stimulating the regional economy and bringing old,
struggling communities that had been bypassed by I-95 back to life. Repass
then turns our attention to the proposed New Haven-Hartford-Springfield
line, which is the southern segment of
what is being referred to in regional transportation planning circles as
the "Knowledge Corridor" (Amherst-Hartford-Meriden-New
Haven). This has the potential to be equally transformative for the
southern New England economy.
Together, these pieces raise an important question for Middletown. How
"smart" is our own "smart growth" in the downtown given our extremely
limited transportation options? Many of the people who live in
Middletown don't work in Middletown. And why shouldn't they?
Middletown is a great place to live, especially (as Ed McKeon has been
pointing out recently in his fine
blog)
downtown Middletown. People who live in Middletown but work in, say,
Hartford or New Haven or Meriden have to drive their cars to get to work
-- though some intrepid souls ride their bikes (more power to them).
The city and the Richman Group is now putting the finishing touches on
a major (96-unit) downtown housing development, "Wharfside Commons", on
Ferry Street. Unless there is some kind of workplace-residency
requirement that I am unaware of, many if not most of the future renters
of those apartments will work somewhere other than Middletown. They
will have to drive (or ride bikes) to get there and back.
More downtown housing is a great idea. We can disagree about the scale
and density, and about whether it should be affordable housing, or
market rate. (My own view is that Middletown has plenty of affordable
housing, especially in the downtown neighborhoods.) But we desperately
need public transportation links to our nearby urban centers. We need
to be connected to the "Knowledge Corridor".
We have, instead, a brand-new four-lane highway to Meriden. Let's do
something smart with it.
Midstate Regional Transportation Report - a summary
by Vijay Pinch:
The
Midstate
Regional Transportation Report. A principal member of the regional
planning agency that authored the report is, incidentally, our own Lee
Osborne, downtown resident.
It does make for great reading. For example, of the 30,000 plus jobs
located in Middletown, close to 8000 are filled by people living in
Middletown (these are all based on 2000 census statistics). (One
wonders how many of these folks walk or bike to work.) Just over 1000
come from Cromwell, 600+ from Durham, 600+ from East Haddam, nearly 1600
from East Hampton, 1100+ from Haddam, 500+ from Middlefield, almost 1000
from Portland. This produces the over 14,000 people from within the
region who work in Middletown. An additional 16,000+ come from
"non-regional" origins -- in other
words, outside the Mid-State authority area which is defined by the
towns mentioned (e.g., Guilford, West Hartford, Madison, New Haven, East
Hartford, etc.).
The study authors point out that the vast majority of the people drive
to work in single occupancy vehicles. Middlefield had the highest
percentage of such drivers at 98.1%. Middletown had the
highest percentage of people using public transportation at a (paltry)
1.7%. Haddamites had the highest number of carpoolers, at 10%. Of
course, the Haddam people are also carpooling to jobs elsewhere, like
New Haven or other points along the shoreline. But just imagine what
could be achieved in terms of reducing traffic congestion simply by
creating a serious bus system in and around Middletown, linking (for
starters) the immediately adjacent towns of Portland, Middlefield,
Durham, and Cromwell.
Also interesting are the work-travel data for people who live in
Middletown. Of the 22,000+ workers who list Middletown as their
residence, less than 8000 work in Middletown. Over 11,500 work out
of the Mid-State area (mostly Hartford and New Haven, I would guess).
That leaves about 2500 who work in the regional towns but not in
Middletown. What most Middletowners who do not work in town need, then,
is public transportation links to towns that are outside the regional
planning area.
Regardless of how we slice it up, the single most important lesson to be
taken away from all this is that we need a much better network of public
transportation serving Middletown and the surrounding area, both within
and without the mid-state region and better facilities for alternative
mobility like bikes and walking (so that people who live, say, on
Highland, don't have to get in their cars to get anywhere safely).
|